April 13, 2008

Out of Sight, Out of Mind: Banning Junk Food Ads to Fight Childhood Obesity

This week I chose to explore the blogosphere to see what is being discussed about one of the most controversial topics in children’s advertising and one of the biggest epidemics that effects children today; child obesity and the advertisement of junk food. Childhood obesity has become a growing concern over the years, especially in America, and it was curious to me that not many laws have been passed to prevent children from being exposed to junk foods that promote the problem. Public schools have taken most junk foods off of their grounds in hopes of bettering their student’s health but despite their efforts childhood obesity continues to be on the rise. Kids have the most access to junk food when they are at home and they desire these foods in part because they have seen them on television and influence their parents to buy these unhealthy foods for them. As stated earlier, this is a growing problem in America, but not much has been done to put bans on junk food advertisements aimed at children yet in the states, so the blogs I examined on the topic were from other countries, Canada and Ireland in this case, and here we can see how the American system of shielding children from bad health habits is lacking in comparison with other countries who are working to take an active stance against companies who are advertising to their children. I chose to comment on two blogs that discuss the issue. The first blog is called Weighty Matters and discusses conditions that people suffer from which can be controlled or eliminated by simple lifestyle changes. It is written by a former family physician from Canada named Yoni Freedhoff and in her post entitled “Children’s Junk Food Ad Ban in Ontario?”, she discusses the movement to create a ban on all junk food ads aimed at children in Canada and the resistance that is coming from the companies that create this ad. The second blog is by James Doorley, chairman of the Consumers Association of Ireland, and is called An Irish Consumerist. In his post entitled “Time to drop junk food advertising aimed at children”, he pushes for a law that would ban advertisements of junk food to children before 9pm on television. I have read both of their posts and have made my comments available not only on their respective sites but also have posted them below for your convenience.

“Children’s Junk Food Ban in Ontario?”
Comment:
First I would like to say that I completely agree with your stance on this issue of junk food advertisements to children. This has become a growing issue over the years and is playing a part in the health of children over the world. Most of these ads are aimed at children who are too young to decipher what is being marketed to them but when they see these brand logos on television, such as the Trix rabbit as you refer to, and then they see the same logo when they go to the grocery store with their parents, they are going to chose the product that they are most familiar with and the product that gives them the good feeling that they associate with their afternoon cartoon shows. Obesity among children is probably a larger issue than underage smoking and drinking, and there are bans on advertising cigarettes and alcohol to children, but there are hardly any actions being taken to prevent children from eating foods that could ruin their health for the rest of their lives, but maybe that is because every one eats and food is not seen as being as threatening as cigarettes and alcohol, but therein lies the problem. Food is being overlooked as an issue that should be controlled in most countries because people do have the right to eat whatever they want, but foods that are so unhealthy that they can lead to major health issues should be examined and their production should be reconsidered for the sake of not only children but for adults who suffer from obesity also. There is no legitimate reason to feed a child cereal that is high in fat and sugar as their first meal of the day, and not only should companies rethink their reasons for producing such a product, but parents should also have a role in what their children consume and teach them healthy eating habits in the home so that they can learn to apply these same habits in their lives outside of home. I think it is a great way to get people involved in this issue by providing information on how they can help as you have in your post because there are people out there that are concerned about this topic but aren’t sure if there is much they can do about it and you are letting them know that where there is a will, there is a way. I appreciate your post on this issue and look forward to returning to your blog in hopes of reading more of your insights.

“Time to Drop Junk Food Advertising Aimed at Children”
Comment:
Your position as the Chairman of the Consumers Association of Ireland is clearly reflected throughout your post on this issue of junk food ads for children in the authority that you seem to have over the issue and the depth of knowledge that you display in the field. This is an issue that I wish was discussed more often in the United States and that actions such as these would be implemented as well because childhood obesity should be a concern of parents and the companies who are providing these foods on the market. Others have suggested that ads that are promoting junk foods and that are aimed at children should be banned from television and I believe that your suggestion to ban all junk food ads before 9pm is an equally valid proposal. Ideally companies would stop production on these products that are so high in fats, salts and sugars, but being that these products bring in high revenues for their respective companies and when eaten in moderation they don’t pose any severe health risk, it is improbable that it would be a legitimate suggestion for them to stop producing them. Getting rid of all junk food ads, at any time of the day, would be my suggestion because even after 9pm children can still see these ads, and not only are children at stake but adults too and these ads can promote bad health in households as a whole. I agree with your argument that parents play a role in childhood obesity because they have the majority of the buying power when it comes to the foods in their home and because of this power they should actively use it to provide foods that promote healthy lifestyles and not give in to what their children request to eat because children at a young age don’t have the ability to distinguish between healthy food and junk food. For parents, the health of their families should be a top priority and as you say, for the government the health of their people should take priority over profits made by big companies. This is an issue that is of concern especially to me because I plan to have a career in the field of advertising and getting myself involved in the issues of this market before starting my career has given me a bigger picture of the ethics of advertising and I look forward to returning to your blog in hopes of reading more on this topic.

1 comment:

SAV said...

I would like to begin by saying I enjoyed reading your post and I found the topic intriguing. Obesity has been on the forefront of American health interest. Exploring new solutions to old problems is an important initiative when attempting to resolve this epidemic, and by looking at the ill effects of advertisements, psychologists take another step towards curbing health problems in the young. I believe the image in the first comment section exemplifies the potency of child-directed commercials and the harsh grip it has over our nation's children. Good choice of image. Additionally, you have done a great job selecting two current, high-quality blogs that establish the main theme of your post. I know how difficult it can be to find unifying material. I commend you on your work.

An interesting approach to this argument would be to examine possible counteraction by food companies. If advertisements were to be banned, how would food companies react? What other avenues would they explore to circulate their product? Children are a significant portion of junk food consumers and I assume the saved expense from canceled commercials would allow for new strategies to be explored. For example, food companies may initiate more aggressive product placement in shows with large children demographics. Perhaps even more intrusive campaigns may be undertaken. It is an aspect of the argument that has to be carefully considered.

Finally, I humbly submit a suggestion about your sentence structures. I noticed that you heavily employ the use of commas and lengthy segments. I think that this can be an effective tool. However, I also suggest that you be careful when using this technique often. It creates a conversationalist tone and ideas may become convoluted. Also, beware of run on sentences.

Thank you for your post and I will be looking forward to your final presentation.

SAV

 
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 Unported License.